Parameters for evaluating the main indicators of coloproctological care in the adult population in the subjects of the far Eastern Federal District in 2016–2018

Aim. To work out the unified model for description of coloproctological service at the level of federal district.

Material and methods. The study is the summary analysis of data from the annual statistical observation “The Report of the Chief Coloproctologist of the Russian Federal District” in 2016–2018. The analysis included the following stages: the estimation of staff situation; the assessment of the main parameters of out- and inpatient coloproctological care in 2018 in the Far Eastern Federal District (FEFD) and in its federal subjects.

Results. Staff number of doctors in federal subjects of the FEFD did not change significantly in 2016-2018, it was 0.7 per 100 thousand population. An extremely low availability of outpatient consultation of coloproctologist in all federal subjects of FEFD was found (550.2 per 100 thousand population vs 3000 per 100 thousand population in Russian Federation). The incidence of colonoscopy is the lowest among all Federal Districts of Russia as well – 5.5%. A mean number of endoscopists is above 7.0 per 100 thousand population, which can be considered as the minimal threshold parameter. The total average staffing of endoscopists in the far Eastern Federal district was 86.0% in 2016, 87.3% – in 2017, 85.8% – in 2018. The staffing situation improved in Khabarovsk Territory and in Sakhalin Region while other federal subjects showed negative trend.

Conclusion. The analyzed parameters can be considered as an objective tool for the assessment of coloproctological care efficacy. In the FEFD it needs further development.

1. Message from the President to the Federal Assembly of March 1, 2018 [Electronic resource] URL: http://www.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/56957. Accessed: 09.04.2020.

2. Shelygin Yu.A., Veselov A. V., Serbina A. A. Main directions of organization of a specialized coloproctological medical care. Koloproktologia. 2017; 1 (59): 76–81 (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33878/2073-7556-2017-0-1-76-81.

3. Serbina A. A., Veselov A. V. The need to optimize coloproctology services in the Russian Federation. Klinicheskij opyt Dvadcatki. 2014; 24 (4): 49–56. (In Russ.).

4. Shelygin Yu. A. Clinical recommendations. Coloproctology. Ed. Yu.A. Shelygin. Moscow. 2015; 528 с. (In Russ.).

5. Zakharchenko A. A. et al. Condition and prospects of progress of the special-purpose help to patients with diseases of a colon in Krasnoyarsk region. Koloproktologia. 2013; 1 (43): 28–34. (In Russ.).

6. Vorobyev G. I., Zaitsev V. G. Current trends in the organization of coloproctological care to the population of the Russian Federation. Koloproktologia. 2009; 4 (30): 4–9. (In Russ.).

7. Vorobyev G. I., Zaitsev V. G. Morbidity (by hospitalization rate) with coloproctological diseases. Koloproktologia. 2005; 1 (11): 3–7. (In Russ.).

8. Zaitsev V. G., Artamonova P. Yu., Efron A. G. Multifactorial analysis of the system of hospitalization of coloproctological patients in the subject of the Russian Federation (on the example of the Smolensk region). Koloproktologia. 2011; 1 (35): 3–6. (In Russ.).

9. Ianovoi V. V., Martynov A. S., Orlov S. V., Belyaev O. R. Comparative analysis of the prevalence of diseases of the rectum and colon in some regions of the Far Eastern Federal district (2001–2003). Far East Medical Journal. 2005; 4: 45–47. (In Russ.).

10. Vitko A. V., Korsyakov B. M., Volkov A. V., Zenyukov A. S. About organization of medical care to the patients with oncological diseases in Khabarovsk krai in 2015–2018 years. Public health of the Far East. 2015; 4 (66): 7–12. (In Russ.).

11. Nikonov E. L., Aksenov V. A., Kashin S. V., Nekhaikova N. V. The international colorectal cancer screening programs. Dokazatel’naya gastroenterologiya. 2017; 3 (6): 30–35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/dokgastro20176330-35.

12. Veselov A. V., Sapozhnikov S. P. et al. Organizational and clinical aspects of diagnostics and treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Therapy. 2019; 3 (29): 147–154. (In Russ.)] https://doi.org/10.18565/therapy.2019.3.147-154.

13. Veselov A. V., Veselov V. V., Zapolskiy A. G. Principles of Effectiveness Assessment of Endoscopic Equipment Used for Coloproctological Diseases’ Diagnostics. Medical Technologies. Assessment and Choice. 2015; 1 (19): 38–42. (In Russ.).

14. Veselov V. V., Vlasov S. B., Kuznetsov A. N., Skridlevsky S. N., Vasilchenko A. V. Results of endoscopic treatment of early forms of colon cancer. Klinicheskaya Endoscopiya. 2005; 2: 6–10 (In Russ.).